Ironicschmoozer’s Weblog


YOu know how much I hate to brag… but Adult Programs at my church are worth crowing about

Associate Minister’s Annual Report, Part 1

We have a congregational meeting this Sunday, May 20.  In anticipation of that, I’ve been talking with folks and thinking about a summary of some of the many changes we have experienced and made happen at UUSS.  My areas include Child/Youth Religious Education,  All-Ages Community Building, Management of Administrative and R.E. Staff (including facilities and finance-related matters), New Member Orientations and support of our great Greeters/Ushers, and Adult Enrichment.

Here is a list of the many adult programs we have hosted in the past 12 months, give or take.  Since I am going to Boston for meetings of the grants panel on which I serve, I may not be able to add other reports before Sunday.

Continuous Classes and Groups

UU Readers Book Discussion (monthly)

Poetry Circle (monthly, no longer meeting)

Fencing (semi monthly, no longer meeting)

Tai Chi

Easy Yoga

Chair Yoga

Saturday Meditation (monthly, no longer meeting)

Prayer Circle (drop-in, starts June)

Strangers’ Feasts (circle suppers, starts again in fall)

Documentary Film Club (monthly, no longer meeting)

Women’s Group  (semi monthly)

Gen’X Boomers Fellowship Group

Walkers and Talkers (weekly)

 

Time-Limited Courses and Series

Immigration as a Moral Issue

Health Care Reform

Vegetarian Cooking

God and Consciousness

Mindfulness Based Stress Reduction (2 series)

Palestine/Israel Study Group

Atheist Spirituality

Prayer Circle

Health Care Action Study

Photo Magic for Dummies

Journal and Journey

Soulful Sundown

Global Garden of Unitarian Universalism

God, Consciousness, and Spiritual Literacy

Discussion of “The Power of Now” (starts in May)

 

One-Time Discussions/Presentations

Introduction to the Mormon Religion (June 3)

Summer post-sermon discussions

Unitarian Universalist Heritage and Identity (August 5)

1568 to Today:  Unitarians in Transylvania  (May 29)

Slide Show and Conversation about UU churches in the Philippines

Related Activities to Appreciate,  but not Organized by Adult Enrichment

Newcomers’ Orientation to Membership (3 series/year)

Betty Ch’maj Event with Meg Barnhouse & Kiya Heartwood (April 28)

Alliance Program (monthly, September through May)

Social Responsibility Network:  Beyond these Walls (monthly speakers)

Spiritual Grounding for Leadership (application only)

Congregational Conversations (first Sunday of every month, September through May)

Sunday Soups (twice monthly, winter months)

Theater One performances (two plays yearly, plus one summer worship service)

CUUPS Labyrinth Walks

CUUPS Pagan Holiday Ritual Celebrations

Interweave’s Facilitation of a UUSS presence at LGBT Pride Parade and Fair (June 2)

Attendance of Staff, Lay Leaders and Minister at District Assembly (Pacific Central District, UUA)

What did I leave out that you remember from the past year?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



Spirits in Everything: Cosmology in Traditional Maori Religion — (Mid-term theological seminary paper)

for HR4175, Cultural and Faith Traditions of Asia and Oceania

Pacific Lutheran Theological Seminary

March 28, 2012

Introduction

Key aspects of Maori cosmology are the mythic origins of the universe, the relationship between human beings and supernatural powers, the cyclical nature of human life, and the importance of ancestral connections. Rapid Christianization altered the indigenous cosmology, and colonial exploitation led to Biblically-inspired prophets and resistance movements.

Background of Aotearoa New Zealand

New Zealand has nearly four million inhabitants on its North and South Islands, and several smaller ones.  Since 1907 it has been a dominion of the United Kingdom, like Australia and Canada.

It was one of the last areas of the globe to be inhabited by human beings.   The indigenous Maori arrived by canoe from other parts of Polynesia in the fourteenth century.  Maori culture is based on land and kinship links, as is shown below.

Explorer Abel Tasman sighted it in 1642 and James Cook circumnavigated it 1769.   English Christian missionary activity began early in the 1800.  Now, 80 percent of Maori are Christian (but with Maori cultural influences) and the remainder hold to the traditional religion or other western sects.  In 1840 England presented the Treaty of Waitangi to 35 Maori chiefs, making them British subjects and ostensibly granting them land rights.  However, by deceitful translation of key words in the Maori version of the treaty, the English cheated the Maori out of their land rights.  This led to expropriation, displacement, and alienation for the Maori.  By 1850, the violence and imported diseases reduced the Maori population to equal that of the settler.

When the English arrived, the Maori population was 100,000. Now the Maori make up 10 percent of the population (approximately 400,000), mainly around Auckland and other North Island urban areas.[1]  Land wars with colonial militias lasted from 1843 to 1872. Largely urban-based Maori protests took place in the 1970s and 80s for land and other tribal rights, resulting in a standing tribunal to investigate present violations of the treaty if not original ones.  Four Parliament seats are reserved for Maori.  The country’s official name is now Aotearoa New Zealand; the Maori word [pronounced Ao-te-a-roa ]means “land of the long white cloud.”  Maps are at this link.

Cosmology

The German encyclopedia Religion Past and Present defines cosmology as “a specific culture’s orientation in space and time as conceived in words, images and rituals.”  It continues:  “Religious worldviews represent the complete order…. bringing the visible into agreement with the invisible.”[2]  Myths and genealogies were handed down by oral tradition (but written down after colonization).  The Maori worldview comprises myths, genealogies, and ritual practices and prohibitions.

Maori Cosmogony:  Origins of the Universe

Moewa Callaghan, citing the authorities Marsden and Henare, explains the myth that the god Tane “ascended to the highest heaven … to obtain the three ‘baskets of knowledge.’  These baskets contained the knowledge of the creation of the cosmos, of the gods and of humanity.”[3]  What Tane revealed was this:  Te Po is the great void, a realm of darkness, and a source or process of growth and causation.

Callaghan summarizes origins this way:  “Te Hau ora (the essence of life) begat shape, shape begat form, form begat space, space begat time, and time begat Rangi and Papa.  Ranginui was the Great Sky, who impregnated Papatuanuki the Earth.  These are the original parents of creation, including nature and the spiritual powers inherent in the world.  Their son Tane pushed them apart to emerge from their mating embrace, and this opening led to the flourishing of creation.  Humanity is the child of this god Tane and the “dawnmaid Hineahuone, who was formed … out of the red clay.”[4]

A mythic hero common to many Polynesian cultures is named Maui.  New Zealand’s legendary origin is that  Maui used a jawbone as a fishhook to draw the North Island out of the sea; its name, Te-Ika-a-Maui, means “fish-of-Maui.”  The South Island is Maui’s ship.[5]   He is too much of the earth to be worshipped as a god, but he is more than human, and is invoked in rituals for fishing and planting sweet potatoes.

Atuas, Mana and Tapu: The Supernatural Dwells in Nature

“Departmental gods” is the term scholars use to refer to divinities or powers whose influence is focused on particular aspects of nature or human life.  For the Maori, atuas are the gods, spirit powers, and supernatural beings that imbue all of life and creation or, as Hanson says, are “frequent visitors to the physical world, where they [are] extremely active.”  He notes the kinds of unexplained events that were attributed to atuas: weather, the growth of plants, physical or mental illnesses, menstruation, “the fear that gripped a normally brave warrior before battle, [and] the skill of an artist.”[6]

.  “Maori do not acknowledge chance,” writes Callaghan.[7]  Rather, they act in ways to manage, call upon, respond to, as well as avoid the atuas.  James Irwin says:  “[The] gods may be deceived but not overcome.”[8]  The crucial factors for surviving and succeeding in such a spirit-filled world are mana and tapu.  Mana is spiritual or supernatural power, available to chiefs, and invoked by or invested in the rituals of elders, often tribal chiefs or tohunga.   For example, birth rituals known as tohi ora can confer mana on a person.  On the other hand, Maori legend says that “an aborted fetus not given safe burial becomes a malicious spirit.”[9]

Mana is guarded (and ordinary people protected from it) by rituals and by sacred prohibitions and boundaries.  Such restrictions are known as tapu.  Hans Mol notes that tapu sets apart that which is sacred, powerful, significant, or dangerous, or forbidden. [10]

Tapu requirements pertain to food and limit contact with corpses, tribal chiefs, and warriors heading to battle.  They guide the Maori away from offending the gods, lest “the demonic and chaotic would invade one’s world and disrupt personality or the group.”[11]

The concept and practice of tapu is widespread in Oceania, but it is from the Maori usage that scholars of religion coined the English word taboo.[12]

The blending of Christian theology and Maori cosmology began early.  English missionaries translated God into Maori language as Atua, and heaven into the mythical sky-god’s name, Rangi.  Irwin cites two Maori terms for sin:  hara means harm brought by a “ritual failure” (the improper handling of mana), whereas he means an ethical failure, a wrong done to another person.[13]

Over generations, Maori poets and chiefs passed down various legends (not one version) of the origin of the universe and humanity, but after 1858 (when the Old Testament was published in Maori) they “redacted a more uniform version.”  This version introduced a God similar to the Judeo-Christian Almighty, “a preexistent, supreme god, Io, whose essence fertilized the womb of potential being and set in motion the creation of the world.”[14]

Death and Eschatology

James Irwin writes that, absent Christianity, Maori religion has “no well defined eschatology.  The dead either go to the ‘Above’ or the ‘Below’ and life in either place seems to be much as it is here….[with] no suggestion of reward or punishment.” [15]

Moeawa Callaghan explains:  “Ancient Maori, who navigated such long distances did not believe in an end time.  Life returns to Te Po [the realm of darkness] for re-creation and to Te Amo Amrama, the world of light and transformation.”[16]  Hanson confirms that “death marked the return of the spirit to its point of origin.”[17]

More important for Christians to understand, Irwin says, is the Maori’s “solidarity with the ancestors… and the generations to come.” In the Maori Apostle’s Creed, he points out, the word for “communion of the saints” is Kotahitanga, meaning unity or oneness.[18]

Genealogies:  Maori Ancestors in Canoes

The Maori do no think of themselves as part of the branches of a family tree, in the western sense, but “as descendants of the various crews of canoes which landed in New Zealand in the fourteenth century.”[19]  This idea has mythic origins and a cosmic resonance:  “[Where] Westerners see [the constellation] Pleiades in the sky, the Maoris saw the prow of a canoe….  The tail of the Scorpion is the canoe of Tama-rereti in which the star-children and their elders were placed in mythical times.”[20]

A canoe represents one’s family identity and tribal grouping; it symbolizes travel and recalls Maori origins, yet it also suggests instability and the possibility of relocation.[21]  With such prominence in life and history, it is not surprising that the process of a woodworker fashioning a canoe (or builder making a house) is tapu.  The atuas “animated [their] creative work.”[22]

Words of the ancestors provide guidance to the living as people recite proverbs and recount stories.[23]  In particular, tribal recitations of a genealogy (whakapapa) connect people to their ancestors’ experiences and link them to cosmic origins.  Given that identification with particular territory is key to ancestral connections and spiritual identity in general, the colonizers’ expropriation of Maori lands not only brought material hardships but provoked the spiritual disaster of alienation.

Colonialism:  Theft of Land as Loss of Sacred Space

Missionary Samuel Marsden held the first Christian service in New Zealand on Christmas 1814.  Mainly over the North Island, missions from the following traditions spread fast in the early nineteenth century: Anglican, Roman Catholic, and Wesleyan.  (The largest denominations now are Anglican, Catholic, Methodist, and Latter Day Saints.[24])   The indigenous Ratana church and smaller Ringatu church are important sects.

When Samuel Marsden raised the English flag in 1814, he did not know that “Maori tribes claimed unoccupied land by setting up a pole and kindling fires.”[25]  In resistance to accelerated missionary conversions in the 1830s, Maori leaders cut down British flagstaffs.

Mana o te whenua means “power over the land.” According to Jean Rosenfeld, to deceive the 35 chiefs who signed the Treaty of Waitangi, the British substituted another word for mana in order “to subvert the chiefs’ authority over their territories.”  Her article is not clear if the substitution was in the English or Maori version of the treaty, but other sources confirm that the English misrepresented the agreement the Maori.[26]

The Maori waged war over the loss of their lands from 1843 to 1872. “In 1856, chiefs [of] tribes of the North Island and the South Island gathered around a flagstaff” to form common defense by granting “their mana over their combined territories to the first Maori king.”[27]

The Encyclopedia of Religion says:  “Sacred space is a fundamental feature of Maori religion.  A tribe’s land is marked by wahu tap, ‘sacred places’ named for what happened there and commemorated” in the telling of genealogies.

Land gave the Maori “a collective rather than individual knowledge of place, belonging.  It was the place where the bones of one’s ancestors were buried.”  Hence, the loss of land “meant the destruction of … hapu (subtribal cohesion)….[28]

A sacred space common to all tribes is the marae, an open place near the chief’s house on which the genealogy was recited, and where public gatherings still take place.[29]  In the post-colonial context, the marae appears in tribal areas and urban gathering place.  It has developed into an entire meeting and ritual complex, still under the charge of ritual leaders.

Prophetic Resistance, Maori Syncretism, and Accommodation

Much of the rapid conversion of the Maori took place before the majority of depredations and displacements brought by the colonizers.  In reaction, some of the Maori rejected the missionaries.[30]  Some Christian Maori left the faith for the Maori religion.  Some chiefs and charismatic persons remade their new religion into a source of resistance.

For example, during the land wars against English militias, Maori fighters included “disciples of unconventional tohunga [chiefs] imbued with mana from the Holy Ghost, Gabriel and Michael, as well as the gods of their respective tribes.”  Known as prophets (poropiti), many saw themselves in accounts of the Hebrews’ captivity, liberation and exodus toward the Promised Land.[31]  Though they were Christian, they emphasized Old Testament stories and models for this reason; their leaders took on the role of Hebrew prophet.

In the 1860s, Maori warrior and preacher Te Kooti founded the Ringatu movement; the name means “upraised hand.” (During an exile he studied the Bible, especially Psalms, Judges and Joshua).[32]  In the 1920s, the reformed alcoholic and visionary Tahupotiki Wiremu Ratana founded his Ratana sect.  (Smaller or less prominent groups arose also.) Among other leaders, the charismatic Ratana encouraged and practiced faith healing, recalling Biblical models but also responding to the real health crises of infection and mental anguish.

Conclusion

The striking natural places of New Zealand’s islands can make it understandable to even a casual tourist why the Maori saw the world imbued with powerful spirits of life and why the land and sea are the factors of humanity’s place in the cosmos.   This makes the unjust colonial expropriations and dislocations even more tragic.

In contrast to the long colonization history of the Americas, New Zealand has become overwhelmingly western and Christian in a short time.  Yet Maori culture and identity persist in–and shape–the dominant culture.  This is the Maori religious heritage:  honoring nature, human ancestry, a sense of place, and the sacredness of the ordinary.  There is value for all of us in not only respecting this heritage but in heeding it.

 

 

 

 

Bibliography

Auffarth, Christolph. Cosmology. Vol. 3, in Religion Past and Present, 505-509. Leiden:   Brill, 2007.

Callaghan, Moeawa. Theology in the Context of Aotearoa New Zealand. MA thesis.           Berkeley, CA: Graduate Theological Union, 1999.

de Bres, Pieter H. “The Maori Contribution.” In Religion in New Zealand Society, by         Brian and Peter Donovan, editors Colless. Edinburgh: T. &T. Clark, 1980.

Irwin, James. “The Maui Myth Cycle.” Colloquium: The Australian and New Zealand      Theological Review 14, no. 1 (October 1981): 40-45.

Hanson, F. Allan. Maori Religion [First Edition]. Vol. 8, in Encyclopedia of Religion,         5697-5682. 2005.

Mol, Hans. The Fixed and the Fickle: Religion and Identity in New Zealand. Waterloo,       Ontario: Wilfid Laurier University Press, 1982.

Orbell, Margaret. “Maori.” In Religion Past and Present, 37. Leiden: Brill, 2007.

Rosenfeld, Jean E. Maori Religion [Further Considerations]. Vol. 8, in Encyclopedia of     Religion, 5682-5685. 2005.

Notes


[1] (Rosenfeld), 5683.

[2] (Auffarth 2007).

[3] (Callaghan 1999), 81.

[4] (Callaghan 1999), 82.

[5] (Irwin 1981),41.

[6] (Hanson 2005), 5679.

[7] (Callaghan 1999),89.

[8] (Irwin 1981), 42.

[9] (Irwin 1981), 41.

[10] (Mol 1982), 8.

[11] (Mol 1982), 13.

[12] (Orbell 2007).

[13] (Irwin 1981), 43.

[14] (Rosenfeld 2005), 5683.

[15] (Irwin 1981), 45.

[16] (Callaghan 1999), 90.

[17] (Hanson 2005), 5679.

[18] (Irwin 1981), 45.

[19] (Mol 1982), 7.

[20] (Mol 1982), 7.

[21] (Mol 1982), 7.

[22] (Hanson 2005), 5682.

[23] (Callaghan 1999), 89.

[24] (Hanson 2005), 5682.

[25] (Rosenfeld 2005), 5682.

[26] Ibid.

[27] (Rosenfeld 2005), 5683.

[28] (Mol 1982), 8.

[29] (Rosenfeld 2005), 5682.

[30] (de Bres 1980), 32.

[31] (Rosenfeld 2005), 5683.

[32] (de Bres 1980), 35.



Another Great Stewardship Testimonial–UUSS–Sunday, Feb. 26, 2012

Next Sunday morning is Celebration Sunday, when members and pledging friends will make their pledges of support for the upcoming budget year at our congregation.   Each Sunday a member or friend has delivered a testimonial about their feelings about the congregation and their financial commitment to its ministries and programs, staff, upkeep and outreach.  I have posted all of them on the blog.  Here is the latest.

Hello and good morning,

My name is Jorge.  About 8 years ago I started to attend this congregation ever since my partner, Ron, introduced me to the idea of Unitarian Universalism.  I was born in a small town in western Panama and raised in strong catholic family environment.  If my Father could see me now in a pulpit, he would fall on his knees shouting …. “ES UN MILAGRO….it’s a miracle.”

 

Growing up, I was the perfect catholic boy attending mass every Sunday, going to the confessionary and along with it, its corresponding hale Maries and Our Heavenly Fathers as penance for my previous week of mischievous acts.  However, as I got older I started to get more curious about the natural world and wanted to learn more about Science.  Something within me started to question some of the beliefs that I was taught in Catechism. My parents could not understand why I was being so stubborn asking such questions and now I can only imagine what went thru their minds…a heretic son!  So surely, I started to drift away from the Church and ultimately walked away from all the mumbo-jumbo of incoherent ranting, homophobia among many others….the list is long!

 

Science ignited my mind and beliefs, and taught me to truly seek the truth and not just be a mindless automaton.  I have followed that career truly applying the Scientific Method into my life.

 

And yet, here I am as a “friend of UUSS” as friend of this congregation speaking out why I support this institution.

 

I enjoy the camaraderie of peers who charm, challenge and comfort me — I am not alone.  This congregation is indeed a SAFE HARBOR.

 

I am comfortable with the ongoing ceaseless ferment of ideas here.  I align with the important work of social justice and the path that this UU has carved into our noble history.

 

I want to help sustain this community, a community for the stranger who may come thru that door next week, who may be seeking what UUs can give.  And I hope, beyond my years on this planet, that such strangers will become like me, supporting this ongoing community.  This place is truly a BEACON OF LOVE and JUSTICE.

 

 

 



TERM PAPER APPENDIX 4 (finally!)–Reflections on Our Colonial Involvement and Our Post-Colonial Distance

 

[If you just got here or stumbled into this blog, this is the last installment of sections from a term paper about the Unitarian Universalist Church of the Philippines.  I think if you go backward to read all the posts, you'll find all the sections except those I have chosen not to post.]

Appendix IV:  Reflections on Our Colonial Involvement and Our Post-Colonial Distance

It is worth noting that the UUA is an American Mainline Protestant denomination long dominated by elites.  We claim several dead presidents and have at least two buried in our churches. (Though the Universalist Church of America did have more class diversity from the Unitarians ever since their separate origins in America, as a movement the Universalists had been in decline and had much less wealth by the 1961 merger.)

According to Stanley Karnow, the Spanish American War had been “masterminded” by Senator Henry Cabot Lodge (a Unitarian), among others, and the senator then advocated annexation.[ii]  In 1900, William Howard Taft (also a Unitarian) became the first American governor of the Philippines; later he became the U. S. President and Chief Justice of the Supreme Court.

Given our contemporary UU self-understanding of the UUA as a justice-oriented denomination, it is worth noting that American religious liberals were involved in the running of the Philippines, and hence from prospering from it as a colony.  Perhaps the ambivalence about admitting the Philippine church arose in part from a reluctance to look at our own movement’s connection to the colonial depredation of that nation.  These architects of the annexation of the Philippines leaders apparently kept their liberal theological values separate from their careers as advocates for colonial power.

Have we kept our distance from the Philippine church—either in not thinking Filipinos could find anything in our tradition that speaks to their experience, in not wanting to admit the UUCP to the UUA, or in not wanting to share, give, or  “impose” our American church practices and theologies on a marginalized group?   Perhaps, in the names of avoiding renewed colonialism and promoting the Philippine church’s authenticity and autonomy, we have been endeavoring to distance ourselves from our connections to the American colonial era in the Philippines.   Whether we can answer them or not, we carry such complex questions into new and ongoing relationships between UUs there and UUs here.

For further information:  The subjects of American colonialism and the Unitarians involved in the Philippines is addressed in Frederick John Muir’s book Maglipay Universalist:  A History of the Unitarian Universalist Church of the Philippines (Annapolis:  Unitarian Universalist Church, 2001).

Muir in particular describes the early contacts between the American Unitarian Association (AUA) and the Iglesia Filipina Independiente, the Catholic breakway movement led by Father Gregorio Aglipay.  Aglipay visited the Unitarians here in the early 1930s, and the AUA president tried and failed to lead a strong relationship with that Philippine movement, which later affiliated with the Anglican Communion.

This paper keeps the focus on the later movement (the UUCP) with which present-day North American UUs have a living and growing relationship.


[ii] Stanley Karnow, “The Philippines,” Dissent Magazine, Winter 2009.  http://www.dissentmagazine.org/article/?article=1326



TERM PAPER APPENDIX 3–Is It Christian? Historical Details on American Unitarianism

Appendix III: Is It Christian?  Historical Details on American Unitarianism

This question has been a source of conflict within our movement, especially on the Unitarian side of our history.  It was a dispute about how far liberalism in religion could go and still resemble its original form—and still resemble a religious movement.   In the 1800s, as ministers and other Unitarians moved west and gathered new congregations, many claimed the label Unitarian but not the label Christian.  They spoke of “ethical religion.”  They argued that attempts to describe the movement as Christian were infringements on spiritual freedom and the liberty of religious conscience.  Unitarians who led the denomination in Boston and those who lived closer to Boston than to the Midwest argued that we would risk losing our roots and sense of identity if we did not, as whole, describe our movement as a liberal form of Christianity.

Points in history often identified as the departure from considering ourselves Christian include the Transcendentalist Movement of the 1830s to 1850s (a literary, philosophical and spiritual movement led by resigned Unitarian minister Ralph Waldo Emerson and other intellectuals, most of whom had grown up as Unitarians).

Other factors included the Free Religious Association (founded in 1867 by radical Unitarians unhappy with a sole Christian focus), and the Western Unitarian Conference (founded by radicals to recruit ministers and plant churches in order to spread Unitarianism to what is now the Middle West).   In 1887, this Conference adopted a document entitled “The Things Most Commonly Believed Today Among Us.”  Written by William Channing Gannett, it allows for the presence of non-Christian Unitarian beliefs.

A document called the Humanist Manifesto, was published as a magazine article in 1929 calling for a reform of religions so they serve human needs rather than restricting the full flourishing of human life for adherence to disputable doctrines.  IT carried the signatures of 15 Unitarian ministers, 17 college professors (primarily in philosophy) and one Universalist minister.[1]   All of the signers were white men.  During much of the twentieth century, many Unitarians (and, since 1961, UUs) have referred to themselves, and often to their whole congregations, as Humanists.  For many, this has meant agnostic or even atheist.

To an outside visitor, a typical UU church service in much of the twentieth century might have seemed like a long lecture with a few pieces of classical music, a song or two, and announcements about life in the church and local community.  However, since the early 1980s, many UU ministers and lay members have “rediscovered” spirituality:  the importance of personal spiritual practice, study of the Bible and other scriptures, and exploration of one’s religious background, including Jewish, Christian or other traditional rituals in families.  Perhaps the recent openness to fellowship with indigenous Unitarians or Universalists in other countries is a reflection of our recent rediscovery of spiritual expressiveness.

For more information:  “Unitarianism,” by Mark Harris, The Cambridge Dictionary of Christianity, Daniel Patte, ed. (Cambridge, 2010:  Cambridge University Press), 1263-4.

 



Sky-High Sabbath– On my Way to the Philippines

Saturday I fly from SFO to Tokyo and then to Manila.  Two days later I fly to Dumaguete City, on Negros Island, where the UU Church of the Philippines has its HQ.   They will be hosting the conference of the International Council of Unitarians and Universalists.

Assuming little turbulence, I like flying in a plane.

I get a lot of reading done.  Few interruptions–except for the beverage cart and the food cart (on international flights).  I also catch up on my popular culture with the little TV screen on the seat back in front of me.

Getting on a plane is a way for me to MAKE MYSELF take a break.  Since adding some administrative and managerial duties to my portfolio (which I enjoy) and starting  part-time doctoral studies, I’ve been busy.  I thought January would be easier.  School was not to start till January 31.  I have done a lot but many things remain unfinished, not even started!   Except for travel to Tucson on MLK Weekend, I have not taken a full day off during any week since Sunday, January 1.

I will be doing UU business, with liberal religious friends new and old from nearly every continent, so it’s not really a vacation.  But it’s a change of pace, change of venue, change of perspective.  That’s what Sabbath is supposed to provide.  It starts on the jumbo jet.

Amen!



TERM PAPER APPENDIX 2—Partner Church History—UU Church of the Philippines and North America

 

Appendix II:  Partner Church History—UU Church of the Philippines and North America[1]

Philippine Church Location Partner Church Relationship Year
Ulay, Negros Occidental Partnered with UU church in San Mateo, California 2001
Calapayan, Negros Oriental Partnered with UU church in Montclair, California 2007
Caican, Negros Oriental Partnered with UU church in Honolulu, Hawaii 2001
Banaybanay, N. Oriental Partnered with UU church in Appleton, Wisconsin 2011
Cansayan-Aquino, N. Oriental Partnered with UU church in Castine, Maine 2009
Malingin, Negros Occidental Partnered with UU church San Diego, California 2007
Doldol, Negros Occidental Involved with UU women’s group, Annapolis, Maryland 2006
Nagbinlod, Negros Oriental Seeking partner; in conversation:  Adelaide (Australia)
Nataban, Negros Occidental Seeking partner; in conversation:  Sacramento  
Dumaguete City, N. Oriental Seeking partner  
BagongSilang,  N. Occidental Seeking partner  
Bicutan, Metro Manila Seeking partner  
Samayao, Negros Oriental Partnership lapsed in 2007 with Hayward, California 2001

[1] Lee Boeke Burke, UU Partner Church Council, in an email correspondence with author, December 10, 2011.



Five Habits of Healthy Congregations–Leading, Following, Participating, Building Trust

What is Leadership?  What is Followership?  Both have to do with trust and participation.

I’ve enjoyed many articles about ministry and healthy congregational dynamics by the mainline church consultant Anthony Robinson.

This article is especially good.  If you are in any church/denomination whose polity is congregational, or even one with a fair degree of congregational decision making, I think it’s relevant.   If you are a Humanist, Buddhist, Pagan, or Jew then the Christian language and context of some of the paragraphs may not be to your liking.  If you can’t translate into your own faith idiom, that’s okay, just read them and move on to the other paragraphs.

If you are allergic to words like “follower,” I beg your patience with the gist of his article.   In fact, there’s a good definition of the term followership, as coined by my UU colleague Paul Beedle.  And no less an authority than Harvard’s Ronald Heifetz is quoted in defining leadership NOT as solitary authoritarianism but in the skill to be present and help the community face its big questions and its big challenges–together.

If you can’t open it, let me know and I can lend you the paper copy.



TERM PAPER PART 8–Universalism in Negros: Story of An Accidental Apostle


As young man, Toribio S. Quimada moved with his Roman Catholic family from the Visayan island of Cebu to nearby Negros.  They lived with a Presbyterian uncle, who had a Holy Bible.  The young man read the Bible for the first time and became a Protestant.  Later he got involved with a Pentecostal movement and joined it.  He became a preacher and musician, spreading its message in island villages.  One day in the mail Quimada received a package of books wrapped in an American newspaper.  On the paper was a directory listing of churches.   Looking for his Pentecostal denomination, Iglesia Universal de Cristo, he noticed instead the Universalist Church of America.  Sounds close!  This Universalist church was located in Wisconsin.  He wrote a letter to it and waited for an answer.  Nobody answered.  A few years later, he looked in an almanac, and again he saw the Universalist Church.  He wrote another letter, this time to Massachusetts.  A reply came this time, and a long-distance friendship began.

Though he had been a Pentecostal, Quimada found the message of this American church to match his own views.  What Universal salvation means is that everybody’s going to heaven.  He loved the gospel of this church:  God is love.  Everybody is a child of God.  Quimada wanted to spread the word, so he wrote the Americans:  “Will you send us missionaries?” Well, we don’t have missionaries, they said but they will help.  They sent worship and education materials, Bibles and other books, and a little money.  Toribio put his life into this new ministry, traveling from village to village on horseback, or hiking on foot.  He would preach for an hour in front of market places, playing his guitar, making friends.  People listened to him, some argued, and some of them came to church.  Quimada gathered church members, recruited men to be ministers, and started new congregations.   To the poorest of the poor on this island, they spread the message:  Be joyful!  God is love.  You are a child of God![1]

As Toribio spread the faith in the peasant class of his island, over in the United States the once-numerous Universalists were in decline.   The Universalist Church of the Philippines was incorporated in 1955.  The Universalist Church of America ended six years later, when it merged with the larger and wealthier American Unitarian Association, in 1961.

 

 


[1] To learn more about the ways Christianity spreads, and further insights on the UUCP, I plan to consult Andrew F. Walls, The Cross Cultural Process in Christian History (Maryknoll, N. Y.:  Orbis Books, 2002).



TERM PAPER Part 7–Unitarianism and Universalism from New England to the Pacific Coast

 

The first Unitarian or Universalist church on the Pacific Coast was the Unitarian congregation established in 1850 and served by the legendary Thomas Starr King in 1860.[i]  In his 1957 book Unitarianism on the Pacific Coast, the Rev. Arnold Crompton wrote that Unitarian ministers and lay leaders came west following the California Gold Rush and the completion of the transcontinental railroad.  Crompton attributes the growth of Unitarianism to five factors:

First, “transplanted” New England Unitarians wanted a church like those back home….  Second, the tightening of the lines of orthodoxy [in the larger society] gave rise to conscience problems among liberal Christians which led them to seek their own company….  Third, direct missionary activity… established churches or planted seeds of future churches.  Fourth, the great ministers… by their preaching, their leadership, and their lives attracted people to their churches and denomination.  The fifth factor was the changing intellectual climate [especially scientific challenges to traditional theology].

While conclusive evidence is lacking about the Universalists, it seems fair to assume that similar economic promises and the transcontinental railroad brought them westward as well.  Appendix I shows the dates when most Unitarian or Universalist congregations were established on the Pacific Coast in the nineteenth century.  While the dates are similar between the two denominations, it is notable that many of the Universalist churches did not survive.  One that did, in Pasadena, was blessed by a large endowment from Amos Throop, who also founded the California Institute of Technology.

In the rest of the United States, as the number of Universalist churches and members declined in the twentieth century. The standard history of the movement reports that the American Almanac for 1832 lists Universalism as the sixth largest denomination.[ii] However, in a sermon given in 1995 and revised later on his website, David Lawyer cited census and other date to estimate that 49,000 to 64,000 Universalist church members existed between 1890 and 1906.[iii]  Lawyer argues that, contrary to many claims, Universalism was in decline before the twentieth century, and may never have grown as much as its early leaders announced.[iv]

The Unitarians as a denomination had a stronger missionary activity on the west coast, fueled by the Rev. Jenkin Lloyd Jones[v], a Unitarian leader from the Midwest, and Charles Wendte, who served local churches but also, as part of the Pacific Coast Unitarian Conference, led the planting of many Unitarian churches on the coast.  For a congregationally-based tradition, missionary work entailed pulling together enough local people with liberal Christian beliefs (or better, some with Unitarian backgrounds from elsewhere) and gathering them into a congregation.  This work included advertising, publications, and lectures, working on local causes and civic projects, holding worship and dedicating a church building as soon as affordable.

In 1892, the Unitarian churches in Los Angeles, National City, Ontario, Pomona, Santa Ana, Redland, San Bernardino, San Diego and Sierra Madre attended a conference to organize the Southern California Liberal Conference “as a subdivision of the [Pacific] Coast Conference.”[vi] This reflects a missionary optimism.  Yet few of these churches may have been strong, and half those towns no longer have a UU church.  Just a few years earlier, in 1886, Unitarian leader Charles Wendte (heavily involved in church-planting efforts for the faith) listed only four “stable Unitarian churches on the Pacific Coast”:  San Francisco, Portland, Santa Barbara, San Diego.[vii]

Though based in Boston like the Unitarians, the Universalist Church in America and its state conferences were a much less centrally organized body, and membership statistics are unclear.  While the Universalists’ original evangelistic activity on the other side of the continent was impressive, it is unclear to me whether this Gospel zeal is what led to their founding of West Coast congregations.

In any case, the beginnings of the Unitarian Universalist Church on the island of Negros had no connection to the westward movement of either denomination in the United States.  More recent encounters and relationships do show a mostly-Pacific orientation.  But the founding of the liberal faith in the Philippines was both accidental and home grown.

 





Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.