Filed under: Special Events, Theater (Plays | Tags: book discussion, Jim Scott musician, open mic night, Vagina Monologues
Alliance Program—the Alliance is longest continuously running discussion and fellowship activity in our church (since 1898!). Meets Thursday, April 12, 10:45 AM in the Fahs Classroom. Come for coffee. Guest speaker is introduced at 11:00. Bring your lunch and visit with new and old friends after the discussion.
THAT’S ENTERTAINMENT!—3 events to remember
1–Open Mic Night–SHINDIG at the HEX. UU headliner Jim Scott!
Friday, April 13—7:00 PM for an open-mic portion. Sign up Sunday!
…
Then, at 8:30 PM, acclaimed acoustical guitarist Jim Scott performs an evening of his songs of peace and the environment. A composer, guitarist, singer and ecological and peace activist, Jim was a member of the Paul Winter Consort for years. He wrote many pieces the Consort recorded, including choral works in their celebrated Missa Gaia/Earth Mass. In his world travels, Jim has performed concerts or led services at more than 300 UU churches. His latest project is The Earth and Spirit Songbook, an anthology of songs of ecology and peace. For more about Jim Scott, click his name above.
To sign up as an open-mic act for the first half of the show, please contact Music Director Eric Stetson at eric@uuss.org.
Tickets are $10 general, $5 for performers; children 12 and under are free.
2– The Vagina Monologues—in Sacramento now!
Do you love good theater?
Passionate about ending violence against women and girls?
Have we got an event for you!
The V-Day Sacramento 2012 Community Production of Eve Ensler’s
The Vagina Monologues takes place next week.
This year’s production features a number of CHURCH members in key roles. Janet Lopes and Julie Heston are cast members. Kristen Vedell is
Production Assistant, and JoLane Blaylock is the Producer. Come show your
fellow UUs your support and enjoy this amazing show. It will make you
laugh, gasp, cry, and then laugh some more!
(It will make your family minister blush.)
Monday April 9, 6:00 PM—SOLD OUT! Sneak Peek with Panel Discussion following, at The Guild Theater.
TICKETS AVAILABLE! Saturday, April 14—Premier Performance, with Silent Auction before, 7:00 PM The Crest Theatre. For ickets and more information, visit
http://vdaysacramento.org/. April is Sexual Assault Awareness Month, and we are proud of our UU women for bringing this production back to the community.
****
3—Save the date and buy a ticket: Meg Barnhouse in concert! Saturday, April 28 at UUSS. Read more on page one of the April Unigram.
* * *
UU Readers Book Discussion–Our book for next month is The Tiger’s Wife by Tea Obreht. It is a novel by a young writer about her memories of a grandfather living in the Balkans. Tuesday, April 24, 6:30 PM in Classroom 12 (way back there). Get reading!
Filed under: Politics, Politics, Elections, and Government, Theater (Plays | Tags: acting, community theater, Gore Vidal, The Best Man, Theater One, UU
At last Friday’s opening of The Best Man, the UUSS playhouse had the highest opening-night energy level in my recollection. Gore Vidal’s political drama was presented by my church’s 51-year-old community theater group, Theater One. Roberta Stewart, here since the early years, is the director. We have a number of experienced community-theater actors, some fairly new to the stage (or returning after a long interim since high school or college theater), and some members with professional experience on stage and screen. They are a dedicated team!
For me the play is a blast from the past of political history. I was born in 1961, when it won some Tony Awards but lost the Best Play prize to The Miracle Worker. A Sacramento News and Review writer says it’s Gore Vidal’s best play. It’s about a battle for the presidential nomination of an unnamed political party in 1960, but that was in the era of party-convention drama, smoked-filled room dealings, and last minute changes. Nowadays, nominees usually have their delegates sewn up well before the convention, which is more of a coronation and PR occasion than a business meeting. Few platform or campaign positions are determined now at conventions. I can’t think we are better off, with SuperPACS (thanks to the Citizens United court ruling), bundling of campaign donations, and big-money and TV commercials determining decisions about the last man standing (still it’s a man, alas).
(If you want to read more–and weep–about the undermining of our democracy, check out Thomas Frank’s essay in the April 2012 Harper’s Magazine. It’s not online yet, but you can get the gist of it from this blurb about his new book, Pity the Billionaire.)
Now back to the show:
The lighting and sound design were well-planned and effective, and the set was evocative of the hotel suites where so much wheeling and dealing used to take place, while delegates haggled on the convention floor or perhaps hung out in the nearby taverns of an unfamiliar city. (But no TGIF chain, Chili’s or Hooter’s in 1960.) The leads in the cast really looked (and dressed) their parts, evoking both the public persona and the vulnerability, venality and some strong convictions that lurked behind the roles: candidates, political wives, king-makers, press corps members, and an ailing, plain-spoken, lame-duck president. As a nighttime worker here in my minister’s office, I know they worked long and hard, and with creative thoughtfulness, to make it happen.
The drama is engaging, and Vidal’s humor a delight to hear. On opening night, pauses in some of the dialogue kept the show from having as much dramatic energy as the script contains, but actors stayed in character and covered for one another when necessary, and after that first show I am confident they have picked up the pace. Perhaps it would serve us well to have a discounted “preview” night for future plays, as happens in professional theater. That way the audience would expect that there are a few bugs to work out, but we’d have an audience for the energy it gives back to the performers, which helps them in fine tuning for a later show. Then opening night could be the next night.
This play is an excellent choice for this political year; Broadway agrees, for the revival of the play will open April 1 in NYC. I might like to see it if I visit friends there in July, but I was happy to have a front-row seat at my church for 1/10th of the cost of a Broadway show. (No tickets here are more than $14.) We had a new feature, organized by our PR chairperson: an opening-night gala reception before curtain, including dry wines poured by our own “Sweet” winemaker. The snacks lasted through the intermission and I snagged a final slice of cheese after the show. (The reception was free, because selling wine and beer costs more than it brings in, given the county alcohol-sales permit you have to buy for every event.)
It’s an enjoyable experience for a pastor to watch a great play presented by a cast and crew whom he knows and loves, and Friday night there were plenty of church friends and relatives in the crowd, among others, who also enjoyed the show.
I am grateful to Bobby, cast and crew for introducing me to this play, and providing a live and lively experience of it.
I recommend it!
Filed under: Musicals), Reviews, Theater (Plays | Tags: Miss Saigon, Music Circus, theater, tragedy, Vietnam, war
John, Mark and I saw the last show of this summer’s Music Circus at the Wells Fargo auditorium at H and 11th. I missed two shows of the series: “I Do, I Do,” by choice, because I wasn’t into seeing it, and “Annie, Get Your Gun” because I was out of state. They said the latter show was the best of the summer, and I missed it! (And still have never seen it.) I got 4 stars in the Bee.
John predicted “Miss Saigon” would get 3 stars, and today it did. (Link to review at the end.) The local NPR reviewer said “mixed results,” but he found good things to say about it as well, and like me he favored the second act. I’d say go see it if you’re interested and have $45 to spare and don’t need to see a helicopter and car inside of a building.
I had almost begged off seeing “Miss Saigon,” since I remember the criticism of it: major special effects on stage with some loud, forgettable music tacked on.
The first act was loud–lots of volume and strong voices–but I had trouble making out some of the lyrics. This hasn’t been the case with other shows. (Of course, with familiar songs from other musicals, it’s easier to follow the lyrics.)
It was also quite melodramatic. Yet, by intermission, though I was not in love with it or gripped by the story or the music I was glad I was seeing the show for the first time (it had run on Broadway in 1990 and must have toured everywhere by now).
And I was struck by the misery and tragedy of it: devastated and poor Vietnamese young women trying to survive, being pimped out to American soldiers. War-torn and fearful Vietnamese people pleading not to be left behind as Saigon was falling to the Communists and the United States was withdrawing after a decade of military action. Confused G.I.s over there, on the verge of being lifted out and plopped back into a divided and war-weary American society.
The second act was very strong, and by the end I thought it was a great and important show, if still not tuneful. It was like an opera in that nearly all dialogue was sung, and the music gave the singers a chance to show vocal range and how long they could hold notes. (Very long.) There was no helicopter on stage, thank God. That, of course, was the big appeal of the Broadway production. Instead, during the second act’s flashback to the 1975 evacuation, there was the blare of ‘copter rotors just outside the ramp up from the stage off toward one side. (Music Circus is in the round, so the stage is in the middle and actors and props come in from four long runways [the aisles] which slope up from the stage.) So the G.I.s fled up the ramp into the open hole where bright strobe lights glared and dry ice billowed. It was scary to imagine going up toward that noise and light–and poignant to behold the Vietnamese left behind chain link fence down on stage. When the helicopter took off, you could hear the roar increase as it seemed to fly over the center of the theater and then hear the Doppler effect as it flew off. This use of the auditory and imaginary capacities felt to me more effective than a copter over the stage would have.
Spoiler alert
Borrowing from “Madame Butterfly,” the story is about an Asian woman who falls for an American (a soldier this time, not an official) who leaves her, and she kills herself. I forget if Butterfly had a child, but in this play, Kim has an Amerasian son fathered by Chris, her American beloved. She’s tracked down by her cousin, to whom she had been promised when 13 years old and whom she rejected after she met Chris. He is a commissar, and he wants to marry her now. When she reveals the toddler to him, he wants to kill him, and nearly does with a knife, but she shoots him with the gun that Chris has left her. (Childhood trauma #1.)
Later, when Chris and his wife come to Bangkok to meet her and the son that Chris belatedly found out about, Kim is devastated to know he is married, since she has endured so much to wait for him. She sends off her little boy to live with Chris, his wife and their other kids in the U.S., though of course they first resist this and want to support her and the boy so she can rear him in Thailand. She wants him to grow up in the U.S., and sends him off. (Childhood trauma #2.)
Then, when the boy steps toward his strange new parents, back in her home his mother takes the gun and kills herself. Chris goes back, sobs and cradles and kisses her as she dies. (Childhood trauma #3.)
I avoided reading the plot summary, as I wanted to be a little bit surprised. I read it afterward, and found there were only a couple of minor points I had missed.
I believe we are due for a sequel. The boy would be in his mid-30s and if he’s not had PTSD treatment (along with his dad, Chris), then the next play would be about the mess of his life and would end with either his recovery or his own demise.
Some of the other shows this summer seemed to race to the conclusion in the second act: “The Producers,” “Anything Goes,” and “Oliver.” This one didn’t. The second act took its time, with the 1975 flashback and a couple of numbers.
One of them was “Bui Doi,” an anthem about the Amerasian children left behind by G.I. fathers who had impregnated Vietnamese women. It was poignant, harsh but tuneful, and also earnest. It sounded like a telethon theme, as pictures of kids hung down from the ceiling. Perhaps it has been, and perhaps it should be. Our fathering of those kids and abandonment of them is one more tragic outcome of our cruel misadventure in Vietnam. It makes me think about the ongoing fallout of our long occupation of Iraq and future tragic legacies if we ever leave.
Another strong number in the second act was “The American Dream,” sung by the man called “The Engineer,” a pimp, bar owner, entrepreneur, prison camp survivor, and man hungry to get to the U.S. The song was angry and satirical (and he sang to a glittery, dollar-bill decorated and flag-draped papier-mache Statue of Liberty prop). It didn’t carry forward the plot much at all, but it held off the tragic end and added a more political and socially critical bite.
I think if it takes melodrama and pyrotechnics to get lots of Americans to expose themselves to some of the tragedy of our history, then so be it.
Here is the Sac Bee review.
Filed under: Adult Enrichment and Group Meetings, Comparative Religion, Theater (Plays
Edward Albee, interviewed by San Francisco Chronicle (6/2/11, p. F3) about his play “Tiny Alice.”
The play is “about all religions that we create in our own image and the personifications that we make. I’m convinced that the only thing that can be worshiped is that which is unimaginable–which is why the Mass was always more effective in Latin. Nobody spoke Latin. I made the mistake of reading it in English.”
Were you raised in a religion?
“No, I was raised in the Episcopal church.”
…
what do you think Albee means by that?