Ironicschmoozer’s Weblog


Religious Humanists & Secular Ones: The Difference?

Religious Humanists and Secular Ones

From the interim minister’s sermon for UU Association Sunday,

October 14, 2007, Minnesota Valley UU Fellowship, Bloomington, Minnesota

I would say that a religion is a set of beliefs, practices, and institutions. The diverse members of our many Unitarian Universalist congregations practice their beliefs, observe common rituals, and support and care for their institution.

Many of the longer-term members of this Fellowship may not identify as religious, but I think they are.  They are humanists, to be sure, but religious humanists.  I can think of no other term for the commitment I’ve seen to their values and their congregation than a religious one. 

What’s the difference between a religious humanist and a secular one?  A religious humanist goes to church!  And a secular one has little use for it.  A religious humanist says things like:  this community has been my lifeline.  A religious one says: the people in my congregation are a source of inspiration to me, and a source of love.  A religious one stands up for humanistic values with the joy and commitment of any person of deep and sincere faith. 

The early members of this Fellowship established a pattern of devotion and care for their church home and congregational family.  This culture lives among the current members—so many more people than the Fellowship had in the early years. 

I learned about this church’s culture of devotion and enthusiasm this on my first Sunday on the job.  I rose early, reviewed my sermon, had breakfast, cleaned up, and headed over here.  I arrived more than an hour before church, expecting to impress you when my car was the first one in the parking lot.  Well, when I got here at 9:30 the lot was over half full.  And one person was speeding off after having come to start the coffee.  Volunteers and staff were setting up display tables.  The choir was in rehearsal, the basement was buzzing with children, parents and teachers. 

The only latecomers we had were a few members and first time guests—by latecomers, I mean they arrived 10 minutes before the service.  Such interest in the church, such curiosity and joy in seeking, such devotion, gratitude and care—I call these impulses religious.  I say we’ve got religion!  And it’s pretty darn wonderful.  And to that I say, Amen.  This congregation makes me proud to be part of our religious movement. 

In my view, the purpose of religion—good religion—is connection.    We exist to connect with our innermost selves and with others.  We stretch to connect with those who think differently as well as with those who think like us.  We encourage connections with the natural world, with the spirit of life and the call to compassion.   We help one another to connect with our personal courage and our imagination and hope.  This is our work–religious work.



What’s in a Name… for a Church (or Fellowship or Society)?

What’s in a Church Name?

From a weekly email to congregation  members, November 2007, Bloomington, MN

UU congregations have named themselves in a variety of ways, not all of which use the cumbersome terms for the two theologies (Unitarian and Universalist) that were the original, defining traits of this two-headed, two-hearted movement of liberal religion. 

Any congregation is free to name itself however it chooses to. There are historical and geographical trends, but not any rules.  Of course, it is good not to get caught up in names, for it is the work that we do together that matters.  But I think it’s interesting.

We have 32 “parishes,” as in First Parish of Quaint Old Town, all of which are in New England.  All over the USA we have 126 “congregations,” 101 “societies” (like Sacramento, San Francisco, and First Unitarian Society in Minneapolis), 495 “churches,” and 277 “fellowships.”  In the 1950s and 1960s the American Unitarian Association created the Fellowship Movement to establish churches throughout the continent.  Most of them had no ministerial leadership and little music; they were small and remained so.  Minnesota Valley UUF is one fellowship that’s changed, however, with growth in music, adult and child attendance, and professional ministry.  (Other examples are the fellowship in Appleton, WI, where they have two ministers and 565 adult members, and the Eno River Fellowship in Durham, NC, with about 700.)

Our kindred congregations include three each of “chapel” and “meeting house,” and one “temple” (designed by Frank Lloyd Wright for the folks in Oak Park, IL).  There are 30 smaller, newer churches that call themselves something like the Bull Run UUs, though a church in California recently renamed itself the UUs of San Mateo, and they are neither new nor small. 

I’m fond of the few older congregations named “All Souls Church.”  For me this evokes the liberating messages of our forbears in faith, as well as our ongoing work of compassion, inclusion and the affirmation of the worth of every human being. 

Yes, what matters is the work we do together.  Shalom!



What Is Leadership?

What Is Leadership?

From the sermon on September 30, 2007; Minnesota Valley UU Fellowship, Bloomington, MN

Leadership does not reside necessarily in bosses, officials, experts or authority figures.  Leadership can reside in anyone.  It can take many forms.  Leadership is not about giving easy answers as much as it is about asking the right questions.  This is the message of Ronald Heifitz, a professor at Harvard University.  He’s the author of Leadership without Easy Answers.

 

Leadership is not the same thing as having technical expertise.  A technical expert fixes problems that have clear solutions.  This is important in any enterprise. 

 

But leadership is different.  A leader helps the members of an organization or a community face up to an adaptive challenge, helps them confront it and walk through it. 

 

By adaptive challenge, Ronald Heifitz means a dilemma with no easy answers.  It’s a crisis or problem which  requires members of the group to make hard choices, and to learn new ways of working together.  Responsible leaders avoid making extreme, either/or statements and ultimatums.  Responsible leaders try to keep a space open for new possibilities and new options.  A leader asks questions, and listens, and speaks, and listens more.  A leader helps us frame the problem and reflect on it.  A leader takes responsibility, while also sharing it with others. . . .

   

Leadership is as much about asking hard questions as it is about coming up with answers.  It’s not about quick fixes.  Leadership is about presence.  It’s about showing up.  Showing up is something almost everybody can do. 

 

Can you listen to the point of view of someone with whom you disagree?  Then you can practice leadership.  If anxiety rises as your community faces a dilemma, but you stick around, you are practicing leadership–you are adding a sense of order and hope for the future. 

 

If you find yourself a lightening rod for the anxiety of another person or a group, and instead of lashing out or walking out, you keep the attention on the important work at hand, you show leadership. 

 

If, in the midst of crisis and chaos, you can invite others to take some time with you in reflection, you will practice leadership.

 

Occasionally I hear someone say, “I’m not a leader; I’m just a facilitator, or a coordinator.” I disagree!  Facilitating the participation and work of others is a form of influence on others, and it is leadership.   

 

When you draw a community’s attention to an issue of importance, you exercise leadership.  When you ask a question to help others to frame their priorities, you are leading.  Even when you feel anxiety, if you can stay engaged as your group is dealing with the challenges, you are leading in a quiet but powerful way.

 

It is leadership to help a group notice its blind spots and consider new perspectives, even if by asking timid questions. When you speak up, even if your voice trembles or your knees knock, you exercise leadership. 

 

Edward Everrett Hale said, “I cannot do everything.  But still I can do something.  And because I cannot do everything I will not refuse to do the something that I can do.”

 

Can you can help another person to speak up?  Can you can make space in a group for a differing voice to be heard?  If so, that’s leadership. 

 

If you can invite someone to a meeting, ask them to pitch in and help, or show them where the signup sheets are, you can practice leadership. 

 

You practice leadership if you can raise questions and then stay around to hear the responses.  None of us can do all these things all the time or in every situation.  I know I cannot.  But sometimes we can, and it can make a difference.

 

Leadership belongs to those who show up, listen, speak up and stick around. 

 

Let us give thanks to the leadership that rests in our own hands, our own minds, our own hearts.  Let us give thanks for those who help us to bring it forth.



Are Unitarian Universalists Christian?

Are Unitarian Universalists Christian?
The answer to this question depends on whom you ask. “Are UUs Christian?”

No, not anymore…. Not necessarily…. Some of us are…. Some of us used to be…. Some of us never were…. Some Trinitarians and even more Evangelicals would say we’re not, no matter what any one of us would say. I say: Whether or not we are “still” Christian, we are still Protestant.

Let me start from the beginning. Universalism was at first a Christian theological heresy, then a movement, then a church. Unitarianism also was a heresy, then a movement, then a church (first in Europe in the 1570s, then in America in the 1800s). Both movements took place in Protestant churches. Our congregational culture is a Protestant one. Our worship service’s structure is Protestant in its origin, especially in the emphasis on the sermon.

The oldest existing UU churches were founded as Protestant ones. Until a few decades ago, what we know as the UU World magazine was the Christian Register. Historically, we are part of Mainline Protestantism. Sociologically, the Mainline has been middle-class, educated, socially aware, socially tolerant, and not politically radical. The Mainline is not Evangelical or Pentecostal or Catholic or Orthodox. It is not fundamentalist.

Within our inherited Protestant structure and culture we have fostered a rich, varied mixture of theological perspectives. Our mixture of Jews, agnostics, atheists, Buddhists, Pagans, Animists, Transcendentalists, etc., makes us distinctive in the Protestant world. But we are of the Protestant world.

As a liberal religious movement, we affirm the freedom of conscience and the evolving nature of the truth about God, the universe, and human life and purpose. In terms of these values, we have more in common with liberal Christians than liberal Christians have in common with fundamentalist or traditionalist Christians. I’ve learned this from interfaith friendships and from reading a liberal Protestant magazine, The Christian Century .

In 2008, when I was the interim minister in Bloomington, Minnesota, we hosted a showing of the documentary “For the Bible Tells Me So” to an interfaith crowd. Members of area Christian churches came to watch it with us and pastors as well as parents of gay people spoke as Christians against homophobia and for the practice of compassion and the celebration of love in all its forms.

My UU ministry colleague and professor of theology Dr. Paul Rasor allows that Unitarian Universalism is “post-Christian” as a religious movement. He says also that it matters very much that it is “Christian that we are post.”



Introductory Words for Peace Vigil 3/19/09
March 19, 2009, 9:11 pm
Filed under: Social Action & Social Justice | Tags: , , , , , , ,

Introductory Words for Peace Vigil
By Roger Jones, Thursday, March 19, 2009
Vigil Hosted by Unitarian Universalist Society of Sacramento’s UU Peacemakers

Good evening. Welcome to all of you, and thanks for showing up. Thank you to the organizers, volunteers, musicians, sculptors and other artists.
My name is Roger Jones and I have been serving in the role of Family Minister at this church since August. The Reverend Doug Kraft, our Lead Minister, is not here tonight due to a family commitment, but he sends his greetings and his thanks for your attendance.
This is the third annual peace vigil we have hosted. Who was here last year? The year before that? Who is here for the first time?
This is also the anniversary, the 6th anniversary, of this nation’s invasion of Iraq. It happened in the midst of lies and fear-mongering perpetrated by our elected leaders but not without protest, across the nation and around the world.
It is almost unbearable to consider all of the destruction, grief and misery our government has caused both our American military families and the people of Iraq. It is cause for outrage that this has been done with our tax dollars and in our name.
Now we have cause for hope. A year ago the Bush/Cheney administration had engineered an escalation called a surge. A year ago we were in the midst of a hard-fought primary election campaign. What a difference a year makes. The country elected a candidate for president who had opposed the invasion of Iraq from the start, and who said we had no business there. Maybe some of you had a hand in making that election happen!
Last November this country also elected a vice president skilled in the realm of foreign relations and wise about the need for diplomacy in all international matters. And both of them show faith in our founding principles and loyalty to the words of the United States Constitution. This new administration repudiates torture instead of shielding its ineffectiveness and cruelty in double-speak.
Of course, our new leaders are not perfect or pure. The political nature of their jobs makes that an unrealistic hope. That’s why they have you…and me and others like us. We keep on watching and listening, reading and learning, writing and speaking up. We keep on standing up… for the values that matter to us…standing up for progress toward non-violence, equity and justice.
This is what a vigil is all about. It’s about staying vigilant! It’s so easy to be complacent, given the change in presidents. It is easy to be distracted, as so many are by a financial system in collapse and unemployment rising. This is understandable. But we cannot let it be ignored that the nation still has thousands of men and women in harm’s way, serving in Iraq and Afghanistan. We cannot forget that over 4,000 have perished and many thousands more have been devastated physically, emotionally, and spiritually by what has been done to them and by what their country led them to do. We cannot forget.
Hundreds of thousands of Iraqis have died. Iraqi families endure deprivation and illness, they flee their homeland regions, and they live in fear. We cannot forget that. Our tax dollars continue to fund the mercenary soldiers of military contractors. We cannot forget that. Our country continues to build bombs and deal out weapons to a world full of eager buyers. Let us not forget any of this. By our gathering here, let our spirit of vigilance be renewed.
We call this candle light vigil a celebration of hope. Yet it is also a time of grief. We gather here with a diversity of emotions, feelings, and experiences. In a few moments we will be invited to speak briefly, to speak from the heart, and to listen from the heart to what one another might say. Later on we’ll hear briefly from a few local organizations. And of course, we will sing together, and we will hear others sing to us. Thank you again.



Nomination of Child/Youth RE Volunteers for UUA PCD Award

Dear UUA Pacific Central District
Awards Committee and Board of Directors:

For the Junella Hanson Award for Excellence in Religious Education we nominate this couple:

Sally Lewis and David Libby, members of the UU Society of Sacramento  since 1991.

David and Sally’s dedication to the church, support of their staff and volunteer colleagues, and creative openness to new ideas have been exemplary.

They have been a regular and loyal teaching team every two years for
Our Whole Lives (OWL) in grades 4-6. This summer Sally will conclude her seventh and
final year of serving as chair of the Child/Youth RE Committee, during
which tenure she has worked collaboratively with three different RE
ministers and three different RE coordinators or directors. Her work
is often done behind the scenes, but she celebrates and promotes the
RE program through regular newsletter articles and communication with
volunteers and our church board and program council.

Two years ago David was a Coming of Age mentor for a youth, and he
went with the group on their celebrated UU Heritage Tour to Boston. Because of that
experience (or in spite it), this year he volunteered to organize and
co-lead the congregation’s biennial Coming of Age program. With the
help of David, his current co-chair, and our Coming of Age mentors,
the participating youth are baking their way to Boston with four bake

sales, as well as planning a talent show fundraiser (April 11). David also joined the Worship
Leaders’ team this year.

Of course the accomplishment which gives this church couple
–and us–the most pride is their son, Ted Lewis Libby,
who has grown up in this congregation. He is a graduate of OWL, a
regular member of the Senior High Youth Group and currently in the
Coming of Age program. We are proud of our many RE families and
volunteers of all ages, to be sure, and there are many who deserve our
thanks. This year, we recognize the Lewis-Libby family for their
continuing dedication to our church and its ministry of liberal
religious education.

Rev. Roger Jones, Family Minister
Rev. Doug Kraft, Lead Minister
Janet Lopes, Religious Education Assistant



Clown Circus March 22!
March 9, 2009, 2:57 pm
Filed under: Uncategorized | Tags: , , , , , , ,

Clown Circus Returns March 22
By Rev. Roger Jones
UUSS welcomes the Swan Brothers Clown Circus Sunday, March 22, 12:45-1:30 PM under the Classroom 7/8 Big Top. These two guys’ jokes are the most lo-cal cheese around! Their tricks will make you squeal, or roll your eyes, depending on your age. See http://www.sbcircus.com for info. Thanks to Les Corbin for bringing them here.
This is an all-ages worship day, so families can come to the 11:15 service and stay for the show, or come at 9:30, go to lunch nearby and buzz on back to church.
Even if you are tired of the antics of our two in-house clergy clowns, be a good sport and save this date! Our services on March 22 will conclude and celebrate the 2009-10 Stewardship Campaign. Let’s do our best during the final weeks of the pledge drive to put a smile on our clowns’ faces and keep Doug & Roger from getting shot out of a cannon.



Spirit Play–a New Model for our Children’s Program

 

New Beginnings in RE: Two Opportunities for You!

by the Family Minister
1) Here comes Spirit Play! We plan to launch a new model for Sunday children’s programs at UUSS in September, for at least two age ranges.
Using rituals, story telling, and child-selected activities, Spirit Play invites spiritual questioning in multi-age groups of children. In this model of religious exploration and community building, the structure of every session is reliably familiar, but the content has endless variety, because it’s based on stories and asks for kids’ wonderings about the story of the day.
Unlike the longstanding model of religious education, in Spirit Play there’s no need for adult leaders to find, create or learn classroom curricula every year. Yet there are many opportunities to support the program, such as recommending or writing stories, laminating clipart, building or sewing materials for acting out the stories, or bringing snacks.
UU churches across North America have been adopting this model with great success. Janet Lopes and Karen Hirsch recently made a site visit to one of the Bay Area churches now using it. Learn more at http://www.spiritplay.net.
Saturday, May 16, UUSS will host a training day on the concepts and practice of Spirit Play for a small group of adult volunteers and staff. The trainer, Dr. Nita Penfold, developed the Spirit Play model for UU churches. Neighboring UU congregations will send some of their members to this training, so space is limited. Let Janet or me know if you are curious about being a part of this new venture for the 2009-10 church year.
2) This summer’s Sunday Religious Education programs will feature enlivening encounters with the arts—and with our own artists. Do you know someone with an artistic talent to introduce to our children and youth? Are you such a person?
Don’t worry, you won’t be alone. Every session will have a guest presenter as well as an adult helper, and we seek volunteers for both roles. The RE Committee and I can help you think through the logistics and plan for an engaging session.
Consider signing up for one or more Summer Sundays to present your talent and lead the group in trying it out–or signing up to assist a guest artist in class.

Blessings,
Roger

PS!—This congregation is nearing the end of our Stewardship Campaign for the 2009-10 church year. Our financial pledges will sustain and support the staff, programs, outreach and varied ministries of the congregation, including Adult Enrichment, Child and Youth Religious Education, All-Ages Events, Newcomers’ Orientation Classes, and Sunday Services. Thank you all. Your generosity makes a difference!



Ordination Sermon–Hospice Chaplaincy

The Ordination of Kate Kennedy                                     5:00 PM, Sunday, March 8, 2009

Sermon by Roger Jones                                                            UU Church of Davis, California

 

 

Rarely do we see a new minister so gifted in so many of the arts of ministry at such a young age. Rarely have I seen such optimism, clarity of calling, and passionate commitment as I’ve seen in Kate, not to mention spiritual depth and emotional balance. Given all that, it’s amazing that I actually like her.  But I do!           

I am awed by the special ministry of hospice chaplaincy to which she is drawn.  To give pastoral care near the end of life is demanding, painful and scary. Through my dozen years as a parish minister, it’s been daunting to try to be of service to people in their last days or months and to those who are grieving a loss.  It’s humbling to be asked to lead a memorial service.  Yet all these daunting tasks are fully engaging, and I recall such moments as among the most rewarding in my career.  Like many other aspects of ministry, this work does not yield something concrete like a sermon, classroom lesson, service project, fundraising goal or a long-range plan.  Instead this ministry yields personal transformation and enriching memories.  And this ministry embodies a calling that is shared by us all, in a congregation and beyond these walls, by ordained and lay people alike.

As we heard in the song, we are called to sing “with love and the will to trust.”    We are called to serve life, Life with a capital L.  We are called to affirm life, even in the face of death and even with the knowledge that we will lose all that we love.  We are called to affirm life by going places in our world, communities, relationships and our souls where life is not fun or clean or easy.

Hospice chaplaincy seems primarily to embody pastoral work, yet it has a priestly aspect as well.  A friend of mine reminded me of the priestly role of the shaman in some indigenous traditions.  In ritual the shaman descends into the holy and secret place where death resides, and encounters death, face to face.  Symbolically, the shaman takes us along on the journey, and returns us to life.  Of course, the hospice chaplain or pastor is a companion of the dying person far into this journey, though not the whole way.  The chaplain must draw close to the one who is dying, close to the mystery of death.  This is holy work and hard work.  Though gratifying, it causes pain to get close to someone, only to say goodbye and let go.  Such holy work requires spiritual care for the care giver as well as the client.  The care and support of colleagues and community is crucial to this hard and holy work.  So is care of yourself. [Looking at Kate.]  Do I need to say anything more about that? Good.

Orson Scott Card is a contemporary science fiction writer.  In his short story Mortal Gods, space aliens have come to earth and established themselves in American cities as friendly neighbors. They build homes that look like houses of worship—temples, churches, mosques.  They, however, not human-like at all.  They are slithering blobs that look like bunches of green seaweed. These smart aliens inform humans that it’s not feasible to visit any planet with life on it, for getting to the closest one would take 500 years.  That’s how long it took the aliens, and the reason they could make it here is that they never die.  They are immortal. 

When they meet an old man, they explain that when humans die, we leave behind the things we have created.  The aliens, on the other hand, must endure the decline and loss of everything they create.  Nothing they build can outlast them.  For this reason, they worship human beings.  To these alien observers, because we are not immortal, we are worthy of worship.  Death causes us to fear, but it gives them cause to revere our lives.  I think the people who work in hospice are like the aliens who praise and honor human life precisely because it is going to end.  Except, of course, hospice workers are mortal, and they are not slithering bunches of seaweed.  

St. Francis of Assisi said:  “Preach the Gospel at all times.  If necessary, use words.”

What is the Gospel of hospice care?  I’m sure everyone involved in it has his or her own good news, which is what the word Gospel means.  My impression of their good news is this:  Though you are dying, you are alive now.  And you are not alone. You are embraced and valued.  More love, grace, wisdom and healing are possible for you and others in your life.   “No matter what is going on,” the opportunity remains to “develop the heart,” in the words of the Dalai Lama. Life continues to offer itself as you receive love and reflect it to others. 

I hope to benefit from hospice care when my time comes, or when someone close to me needs it.  Four decades ago, my family needed it, but hospice care was not on our radar screen. 

When I was nine years old and my brother was a junior in college, he married his high school sweetheart.  This was against our father’s wishes and loud protestations, but I had a new friend in my young sister in law. I had fun watching movies and shopping with her, and going to stay with them in their new mobile home.  Within two years they had a baby boy, and I was an uncle.  Not long after that, my brother’s wife began having serious physical symptoms.  Weeks and weeks of tests at the university medical center revealed a rare type of cancer.  Because my father was a physician, he learned from his colleagues that her prognosis was fatal.  He told my mother; she told her sister.  In a moment of upset, Mom told me, in a vague but foreboding way.  Nobody else in my or my sister in law’s family heard it straight, including her.  Photographs from her baby son’s first birthday party show that the illness and the treatments had withered and weakened her.  Three months later, she died.  I don’t know how or when the denial about her fatal condition ended, but I think she asked if she was going to die, and they told her no.

Those were the days when medicine was heroic and its inadequacies were cause for hushed words.  As I recall, many people with a terminal diagnosis spent long stretches in hospitals and died there.  Death was a shameful enemy, something to fight so much that you couldn’t let up for a moment, even to talk about it.  As a boy, I didn’t know how to talk about it, didn’t know when and with whom it would be okay to talk about my sister in law’s prognosis, or my fears, or my love for her.  I was an invisible witness, not an invited or included participant in this family drama, even though I had been foretold its conclusion. I was thought of as too young to visit her in the hospital.  Had I been able to go, it might have been a source of comfort for her as well as me.  When she died, my brother called my parents on the phone.  I listened in on an extension.  After expressing their sorrow, they told him, “Come on home, Honey.” Then my mother called her sister, long distance. I listened in on their conversation too.  I wanted to hear how you say these things, and how one reacts to the news.  Just after my aunt’s “Hello,” Mom said, “She’s gone.”  My aunt let out a sigh full of pity.

My sister in law died with the best medical care in the state, but maybe not the most complete care.  It was a time when people felt censored from speaking openly about death.  It was a time when the concept and practice of hospice care was just coming out of exile.  In the western world the first hospice opened as early as the 14th century, and of course people have been dying at home through most of human history, with family and care-giving team often one and the same.  The modern, interdisciplinary ministry known as hospice has made it natural once again to face dying with honesty, and face it as an opportunity for growth. 

The minister we ordain tonight has given this ministry her energies and her soul.  She joins with teams of medical and social service professionals not only to ease the last few months of patients’ lives, but to help them experience as much presence, kindness, truth and love as life can hold.

 I wonder how my sister in law’s family and my own might have been enriched by hospice care when she was dying. Instead of keeping separate all those who care for the dying person, hospice invites people to come together.   This is what ministry is about:  calling people together, sharing the joys and sorrows of life, encouraging one another, and revealing new possibilities of relationship.

In 1886 the Russian writer Leo Tolstoy published his short novel, The Death of Ivan Ilyich.  The title character sustains a minor injury in his abdomen while hanging curtains in the nice new home he has found for his upwardly mobile family.  At 45 years of age, Ivan is a high-court judge in the pre-communist Russian bureaucracy, with a wife, a daughter of marriageable age and a son early in his school years. Ivan is proud of  “the agreeable, easy, and correct life that [has] established itself in the…family.”  He enjoys playing bridge and “giving little dinners to … men and women of good social position.”  His “drawing-room resemble[s] all other drawing-rooms, [and] his enjoyable little parties resemble all other such parties.”

“Everything [is] as it should be,” Tolstoy writes.  Ivan and his wife are living as each one had planned to, but they feel ambitious and impatient for more, and unsatisfied with each other. 

            Symptoms develop in Ivan, and his condition worsens over the course of months.  His wife and colleagues try not to take it seriously.  So does he.  When he dares to ask each one of a series of celebrity doctors whether the condition is grave, none gives a straight answer, but each one is confident in the advice and prescription he delivers.  Ivan sees that the doctors treat him with the same attitude that he has treated the accused in his own courtroom—powerful, distant, cold and very competent.  

            Till his last few weeks, Ivan obsesses:  was it the appendix or a kidney or something else?  Which doctor was right?  Then he realizes what nobody else will admit:  “It’s not a question of appendix or kidney, [he says] but of life…and death.”  Tolstoy’s depiction of Ivan’s decline, physical pain and emotional isolation is haunting and heartbreaking.

Looking at the people around him, Ivan sees his dying reduced to “an unpleasant and almost indecorous incident.”  He feels he is in the way—his sickness is an inconvenience to both his wife and daughter.  His questions put off his doctors, challenging their formal ways and superior knowledge.  A colleague visits him and they talk only of work.   He knows that government lawyers are speculating on the opportunities his death will give to their careers.  Tolstoy writes:  “This falsity around him and within him [does] more than anything else to poison his last days.”

Of all the people in Ivan Ilych’s life, the only person willing to be honest with him is the butler’s assistant, Gerasim, a young peasant man. Ivan asks the young man to help him move to the sofa.  Then he apologizes for the bother, and for being helpless and “unpleasant.”  Gerasim says not to worry:  “We shall all of us die, so why should I grudge a little trouble.”   To relieve his pain, Ivan has Gerasim sit and prop Ivan’s legs up, with his feet on the young man’s back and shoulders, for long stretches of time.  Tolstoy writes that Gerasim does “not think his work burdensome.  [He] hopes someone [will] do the same for him when his time [comes].”  Ivan knows he’s a grown man and an accomplished one, but “at certain moments…he wishe[s] for someone to pity him as a sick child is pitied.  He long[s] to be petted and comforted.” 
            Ivan’s wife asks him to let her ask a priest to bring him communion and hear his confession, and he agrees.  Tolstoy gives this event barely a paragraph.  In his final three days, Ivan screams non-stop, a sound his wife cannot block out, though she keeps a few doors closed between Ivan and the rest of the family.  As his body writhes, Ivan asks: Why am I being punished?  He’s been proud to achieve a life that was pleasant and proper, doing what was expected of him.  Now he can’t believe what’s happening.  I thought I lived as I was supposed to live, he asks.  Was I wrong?   The novel depicts an ordinary man whose deathbed regrets are not for any major sins he’s committed, but for the kind of life he did not live, but might have.  Tolstoy shows the insight of many who have counseled the dying.  He shows that even with the guilt of “what might have been,” this dying man deserves mercy.

  Near the end, Ivan Ilyich’s schoolboy son slips into Ivan’s room without the mother’s knowledge.  He takes his father’s hand, holds it and kisses it, for a moment relieving the man’s loneliness and sense of failure.  Ivan’s wife comes in and he sees a tear on her face.  He wants to say he forgives her, but the words come out garbled.  As he feels himself slipping away, he accepts the truth of his death and of his life, and he feels released.   

            Ivan’s death in middle age is terribly painful, but what makes it tragic is that he is isolated nearly until the end.  He’s been isolated from the most important people in his life, and from his own soul, for most of his adult life.  Yet before dying, he receives the ministry of presence from a servant and a child:  he receives a partial easing of his pain, an honest acknowledgment of his fate, a healing touch, and a loving, innocent kiss. 

            In spite of his flaws, he feels God’s love through human love and his own sense of release.  If those space aliens of Orson Scott Card’s science fiction story had known Ivan, those seaweed-green immortals would pray not only for him, they’d pray to him, granting him honor and praise, for the simple miracle that he lives and he dies. 

            Tonight, we give thanks for a new minister and pray for the flourishing of her life in ministry.  Yet by coming together we affirm that we are connected to more than just this minister, but to one another, to all those beyond these walls, those living on this earth, and those who are gone. Whoever we are, each of us is called to the same holy task of relating to the world with honesty, courage, kindness and love. 

The song we heard earlier has these words as its last verse:
“This is the sound of all of us/ Singing with love and the will to trust/Leave the rest behind, it will turn to dust/This is the sound of all of us.” 

It is the will to trust and love that calls a minister into service.  To be our companion, a minister draws on her trust in life, in other people, in herself, and in the Spirit of Love.  To be companions to one another, all of us can rely on this Love.  We can trust it.

So may we live.  So may it be.  Amen.